Tag: AI
-
Thinking vs. No-Thinking in Local LLM Agents: Five Models, Two Trials, and No Universal Winner
Five local model artifacts tested twice with and without thinking, followed by GSM8K, MMLU, and IFEval: quality, safety, latency, and deployment trade-offs.
-
Six Local Models on Tool-Eval-Bench: Tool Calling, Safety, and State
Six quantized local models across 69 deterministic tool-calling scenarios, with observed quality, safety, state handling, latency, token use, and explicit limitations.
Read more about Six Local Models on Tool-Eval-Bench: Tool Calling, Safety, and State
-
Eight Quantized Local Models on Aider Polyglot: An Operational Snapshot
Eight quantized local models across 225 Aider Polyglot tasks, with observed Pass@2, protocol failures, wall time, token use, and explicit serving confounders.
Read more about Eight Quantized Local Models on Aider Polyglot: An Operational Snapshot
-
Debugging Local LLM Benchmarks: Aider, llama.cpp, and Runaway Output
A practical account of building a fair local-agent benchmark, debugging reasoning-model serving, fixing greedy-decoding loops, and adding an exact-repetition circuit breaker to llama.cpp.
Read more about Debugging Local LLM Benchmarks: Aider, llama.cpp, and Runaway Output
-
Concept: An AI-Driven Matching System for Meaningful Connections
Why classic dating apps fail people with depth — and how an AI-first approach could fix it. For years, dating apps have optimized for swipes, engagement metrics, and infinite scrolling — not for compatibility, emotional safety, or long-term value.They match faces, not people.And because of that, many users (especially introverts, analytical types, and anyone with…
Read more about Concept: An AI-Driven Matching System for Meaningful Connections